Theory Of Solomon

This blog explores our working theory on Solomon's edits. Before that, some styling updates to the scripture apps. Also shop work, match dates, watch dates and a headline review.

Psalms 22 (BRB)

This past week Ryan has continued to work on manuscript formatting to indicate to whom the text is addressed. This is controlled under an Address option in the options menus. This formatting is useful for the type of study Ryan is currently doing. Normally, this markup is disabled by default but can be turned on when needed.

The first change this week is the on screen highlighting that is used for this option. There is already a considerable variety of formatting available within our various scripture apps and we are starting to run out of possible formatting options available in web browsers themselves.

Previously, this Address related formatting had been done using a text shadow effect. This did not work particularly well on dark mode displays. So the update this week puts a colored frame around the text where the color of the frame indicates to whom that text is addressed.

The link above is to Psalm 22 in the BRB. If you have the various Address option types turned on in the menus then you can see how this looks.

Ryan has also increased the list of possible targets for this type of speech. The Address option choice menu is the best place to see this. Text can be 1) Addressed to god, as is seen commonly in the Psalms. 2) Addressed to a man, usually a king. 3) Addressed to a woman, usually a queen. 4) Addressed to a group, usually a congregation. Or finally, 5) Addressed to a place, usually Jerusalem.

For a couple more examples, you can use the link above but then scroll down to Psalms 45, which has text that is addressed to the king and queen.

A Theory Of Solomon

We were traveling this past weekend and had a few hours in the car where we could talk about work items without the usual distractions in the shop. We had a long conversation about Solomon and all the things we are learning from Ryan's recent work on figuring out Solomon as an editor.

This is beyond just Ryan's work, it is effecting shop work too. The lamp color scheme shifted to white and red. This was done in part because I could see the gold references to the lamp were likely added by Solomon. This change could not have happened earlier because of our lack of understanding of Solomon and his edits.

As we were traveling, we eventually tried to articulate a general theory of what was driving Solomon and how this impacted his editing work. I felt I needed to write up a more complete articulation of that theory here in the blog so anyone following along with this work can reason about this problem along with us.

Inputs For A Theory

There are 2 basic inputs to the problem of figuring out Solomon and his work. The first is what we know about, or can deduce, given what the text says about Solomon and his own history.

The key idea here is that though his father David was from Judah, Solomon appears to have been more influenced by his upbringing in Jebus renamed Jerusalem. This Jebusite influence appears to have been central to his life.

The second key input for building a theory of Solomon's work is certain loose ends relative to our understanding of problems in the text as presented to us by history.

Solomon's own history suggests he created certain textual problems that remain in the text to our day. As the textual problem is easier to understand, let me start there.

Added Vowels

Years ago Ryan and I took a Hebrew language class. We actually only ever got through the alphabet phase before we moved away from the place where we were taking the class. This is where we learned about Paleo Hebrew letter forms. This was also where we learned how the spelling of words provides a definition of words. Finally, this is where we learned about the problem of added vowels.

The instructor in that class explained how the meaning of words is derived from the spelling of words. As we understand now from our own 3d work, that class was very much incomplete, they were missing a complete and correct set of letter definitions.

For an example, what we know as the The, the Wheel, was taught in that Hebrew class as a snake. The cycling nature of a snake, like a wheel, still matches, but the Hebrew side of this is very weak in terms of understanding full letter meaning. Similar problems exist across the rest of the Hebrew Alphabet. The Table exhibit, by the way, is where letter definitions are definitively shown and taught.

In order to get at word definitions, the instructor also gave us a model for understanding added vowels. These are letters which do not play in the word definition system at all. These are letters added across history as the pronunciation changed. Spotting and ignoring added vowels was thus a key skill taught in the class in order to reach back to the meaning of words.

I would later find that there were a long series of articles, mostly on Wikipedia, dealing with how the pronunciation system of the Roman world began to change rapidly around the year 50 and running for another 150 years. There were places where pronunciation changed so fast that grandparents were unintelligible to their grandchildren. At the time, I suspected that Pentecost was not a point event at the start of Acts, but an event or wave that spread out around the Roman world.

There was a difference, though, between Roman and Latin. Latin was the upper class, legal, language of the Roman world. It was used for written communication and law. It did not change much, and survives even to our day. Roman, though, was the lower class language, not written very often. Roman speakers could easily change the spoken form of the language because it was not tied to many written texts. This is ultimately how we ended up with different spoken languages across Europe.

Hebrew went through some sort of hybrid change. The spoken tongue of daily Hebrew was changing like Roman, but the written Hebrew scripture texts where fixed like Latin law books. This caused special problems for Hebrew scribes.

Our Hebrew instructor's contention was that the spelling of words was being adjusted based on changes in pronunciation. Indeed, we were taught that there were 2 phases in this history of changes. The first was the addition of vowel letters into words. This was taught to us as the first and earliest change in spelling. The second change in spelling was the later adoption of vowel marks. There was no direct teaching on when any of this actually happened, but let me suggest these were not near to each other in chronological history.

The Dead Sea Scrolls do not have any vowel marks. So it is reasonable to consider vowel marks as having come into use at some time after Pentecost. So this would have been following the changes in the language system generally across the Roman world.

Vowel marks are known and stable in the Leningrad Codex. That is a Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament dated to the year 1008. So vowel marks have a window that opened around 2000 years ago and closed around 1000 years go.

But, when, exactly, were whole vowel letters being added to the text?

After Ryan started telling me about the volume of changes to the base text that should be attributed to Solomon, I began to wonder if added vowels go all the way back to Solomon.

Can we explain what Solomon was doing and why he would be adding written vowels? Would Solomon have any special reason to respell every word in the text?

Scribal Care

Anyone looking at original manuscripts knows that there are a series of problems that can show up because of scribal errors. These are usually caused by carelessness. They are usually localized, to words and phrases and so on. You can imagine making a hand copy of the Bible yourself. What sort of mistakes might you make?

We know 6 villainous editors deliberately went through and changed the content of the text. Their work was not of the same nature as scribal errors. The editors were making changes for specific reasons and they had the power needed to enforce those changes on some community that was around them at the time.

Said a little differently, the editors had positional power to cram down their changes, both in the text and on the reading public that used copies of the text. This is a manifestation of asking for a king.

Adding vowels is not a scribal error. Even the use of vowel marks after Pentecost is trying to respect the text as passed by history. The use of marks allows any future reader to see back to the older text. So vowel marks, which do have some nefarious uses, does not upset the text itself.

But, the practice of adding vowel marks itself suggests that scribes did not feel they had the authority to change the basic spelling of words. Changes in spelling must have come from one of our known editors as part of their work.

We have previously assigned changes in letter forms to Nebuchadnezzar, and this likely still holds. But, Nebuchadnezzar probably did not change the basic spelling. Let me review our understanding of Hebrew letter forms and Nebuchadnezzar's changes.

Letter Forms

The drawn form of Hebrew as known now, we ascribe as the work of Nebuchadnezzar. The handwriting on the wall, shown to a young generation after Nebuchadnezzar, is evidence they could not read the older Paleo letter forms. Daniel, the old man, was brought into the room of young men in order to read what was written. This was just after the letter forms had changed. Those young men who were recently trained in reading, likely most of the officials in the room, were found unable to read the older letter forms.

Further evidence can be seen with Ezra, who must interpret the text to a public crowd. That group probably also does not know how to read Nebuchadnezzar's change to the alphabet. They will learn to read Nebuchadnezzar's version of Hebrew under the instruction of Ezra.

What would Nebuchadnezzar's purpose be in changing the letter forms?

He was creating some sort of priestly form of the language. A letter form that was not immediately recognizable to someone who could read the old form. Nebuchadnezzar used the shadow of a human hand, as I discussed in last week's blog, to invent new drawn forms. A few of which still matched the earlier Paleo, but not very well.

This change in letter form allows that community to take on a priestly language which will make it harder for outsiders to learn. Much of the Jewish body of literature remains hard to even find, much less read.

But who added vowels? Was this part of Nebuchadnezzar's work?

Probably not. Nothing in Daniel's era really needs a respelling of the base text. Most of the other villainous editors have no reason to change the language either.

Solomon, though, is different. Solomon does need to change the spelling, and maybe even the entire language. Let me explain.

Solomon Was First

Unlike the other editors, who are themselves building atop Solomon's work, Solomon must compete with public texts which pass audit using both the inspired letter forms and the exhibits found in whatever remains of the Moses era Tabernacle. That tent, with those exhibits, is said to have been lost in David's day. Some members of Solomon's public will know the old system. Solomon must do something to break with that old system.

Solomon was going to write into the inspired text a large body of new work which was not inspired but which would later establish Solomon and his lasting dynasty. Those additions to the text could be discovered and removed by anyone who still knew the old system.

If Solomon changed the spelling of EVERY word in the manuscript, by adding otherwise implicit vowels, then NOTHING in the public texts would ever pass audit, not the original story, nor anything that Solomon himself would write in.

This would suit his purposes well because he could write scripture any way he wanted. As some in the public knew the old stories, no problem, all the old stories would remain, but at the level of the spelling, they would be different. Solomon's additions would now become part of the public canon and nobody would know the difference.

This would also require him to remove the normal alphabet related exhibits. His temple would need a new set of exhibits, a house of idols is what he would need to build instead. Objects that were decoration, or idle, and not part of the active process of teaching, verifying or multiplying inspired manuscripts were all that Solomon would want to include in his temple.

This is why the lamp from Moses' day, became the golden lamp of Solomon's day. The river case becomes the great sea. Shepherd staffs become pillars. The table becomes a table of show bread and so on down the list.

Solomon had to do all of these things together in order for his edits to stick, to persist after Solomon's day and then down through history.

But What Vowels?

As Ryan and I discussed this, we saw Solomon may have had a specific source for what vowels he added and where.

The set of added vowels we know of today in Hebrew texts are not regular. In normal Paleo, the 3d system, especially as seen on the vine, indicates that there is 1 single vowel for each consonant letter.

The added vowel system does not add a vowel after every consonant. Those added vowels were not added to simply call out the otherwise implied vowel sound. The Ve letter, for example, is so commonly used as an added vowel, that a good guess is that it is normally an added vowel. Other added vowels are much less frequent. Added vowels are marking a language change. They originate when the spoken form of the language was no longer following the tongue of Moses' day.

Given what we know about Solomon' biography it is possible to infer his source of those irregular vowels. This will explain why those vowel letters are irregular.

Remember, Solomon is raised in Jerusalem, that Jebusite city which had been renamed. Jebusites are foreigners. They are going to have a different language. Not a severely different language, the table of nations indicates they still spring from Noah. But, they will have a different dialect, developed over the centuries since Noah.

That Jebusite tongue is likely where Solomon got his irregular set of added vowels. From the perspective of the people around him who spoke Jebusite, his respell, or adding of vowels to the historical texts, was not a huge deal. Solomon was making them easier to read, not harder. He was replacing, say, the KJV with the ESV. The texts from Moses were simply being adjusted to fit the current spoken language in Solomon's capital city.

There is a textual clue that Solomon did exactly this. 1 Kings 12:10 is part of the story of the split in the kingdom in Rehoboam's day, which happened soon after the death of Solomon. The young men who grew up with Rehoboam are counseling him to answer with how his "little finger" is thicker than the thumb of his father.

The original stone tablets from Moses day were written by the "finger" of god, see Exodus 31:18. And, remember the story of the handwriting on the wall? The "fingers" of a hand appeared and wrote, see Daniel 5:5. Even Joshua himself would write in the sand. Fingers are a term used in the text to imply writing and letter forms.

The use of the term "finger" by Solomon's son, is marking the written form of the text. Rehoboam is subtly referencing Solomon's change in spelling. The story of the split kingdom after Solomon's death, by using Solomon's finger as the cause, indicates that the civil war was fought over language.

As a final point on this, the Jebusite tongue that Solomon was likely using for his rewrite of the text might be a completely foreign tongue. The audit work is still ahead, and it should indicate which original language is closest to the inspired form. Aramaic and Greek may stand ahead of Hebrew in terms of what actually passes the audit.

Divine Name

One of the more difficult problems we face in recovering of inspired text is to sort out the problem of the divine name.

In the Testimony app, as well as related apps like the Table of 400, Ryan has a step in the build system that substitutes Joshua in for the divine name as found in the base texts.

We built this into our tooling because we believe there was only ever 1 divine name. There is only 1 name by which we can be saved. The New Testament name, Jesus in Greek, but Joshua in Aramaic, is going to be that singular divine name, and will have been used across the entire work.

There are complicating factors for figuring this out. Because the different textual traditions passed to us by history are not consistent with each other on their treatment of the divine name we have an additional level of trouble, and clues, about manuscript editing history.

The Hebrew uses a word that comes out in English as Yahweh, or Yahvah. This is known to most readers as the divine name. There is a Y to J letter trade typically used in most other common names. Yacob becomes Jacob, for example. If we apply that same Y to J letter trade for the divine name, then it can also come out as Jehovah, as used in, say, the 1901 ASV.

Generic Terms

But the Greek and Aramaic Old Testament texts use generic terms in the places where the Hebrew uses this divine name. Greek uses variations on "Theo" or in English the generic term "God." Aramaic uses a term that we transliterate as Master.

This is not the same treatment as we find with most other names, Jacob, for example, is Jacob in all 3 languages and anyone who knows the rules can reverse translate across any of the languages and get the same name in all 3 cases. (J back to Y and so on.) This is not at all true with Yahvah.

So between these 3 main textual traditions we have a lasting riddle. How did these different textual traditions diverge from a single source? Why would the divine name be replaced with generic terms in 2 of those main manuscript traditions?

Ultimately this becomes a question about our 6 villainous editors. Which editor changed the divine name?

Can we ascribe this edit to Solomon? Yes. And there is some textual evidence in support of this as well.

Warnings On Other Gods

The phrase "divine name" is a technical, scribal, term used to identify the textual problem presented by the manuscripts passed by history. The Bible itself uses a different phrase for this. "Other Gods" is the real problem we are addressing. When the divine name is changed, the text can be said to have a different god.

The commandments warn not to have "other gods," see Exodus 20:3. When someone like Solomon comes along and changes the divine name, he has now done this, he now has another god. He has adopted a foreign god.

Joshua 23:16 indicates that transgressing the commandments, by having other gods, will lead to loss of the land. Of course this is what happened at the Assyrian Deportation. This was not an idle threat. Solomon changed gods when he changed the text. Solomon transgressed the written text when he changed the divine name.

It gets worse than this. Judges 2:17-19 asserts that the judges of the people during the time of the judges had gone off and served other gods. Judges 10:13 and 1 Samuel 8:8 continue on the point that the whole land had gone off and were serving other gods.

Finally, the text indicates directly that Solomon himself served other gods, see 1 Kings 11:4. Given the constraint that the text must survive through the editing process, it is trying to tell us that Solomon himself did not preserve the commandments and himself changed the divine name because he served another god.

That magical divine name "Yahweh" is going to be the god of the Jebusites. Solomon simply dropped it in as part of his other editing work.

His edited text was no longer a true witness to Joshua God, and so Joshua let Solomon change that name in order to distance Joshua himself from Solomon's work.

So, Explain Greek and Aramaic

For the other main textual traditions, Greek and Aramaic, their scribes were faced with a problem. Their textual traditions likely split off before Solomon. Those texts originally had the real divine name. But the scribes for those traditions had to keep up with Solomon's editing and writing.

Those more remote scribes are going to see Solomon's divine name as false. So instead of simply transliterating it to Greek or Aramaic, they abstract it to a generic term, Theos in Greek, or Master in Aramaic.

English scribes do the very same thing to this day. Most English texts use various capitalization of LORD, Lord and lord to abstract away this very same divine name problem.

These lord terms in standard English Bibles are markers of a true fundamental problem. None of the Old Testament texts passed to us by history use the original divine name, and modern scribes do not feel authorized to repair that name.

The trap faced by modern scribes is that to put Jesus into the English Old Testament would mischaracterize his own personal nature. It would also bring the wrath of the Jews onto any publishing house that printed copies of such a Bible.

The real root of the problem is that nobody knows how to fix Solomon's edits. This goes for Solomon's edits, but also for the edits of those who followed in Solomon's footsteps. This includes the other editors, Ahab/Jezebel, Nebuchadnezzar, Mordecai, Ezra and Ananias. Acts 15 explains, David's Fallen Tent must be rebuilt before that work can happen. Thus the exhibits must be 3d printed before the audit.

Final Notes

Solomon was a special editor because he dared step up and change the inspired texts to suit his own political purposes. He cracked open the written contract between Joshua and the people. The people had already gone astray, so this was deserved.

This work of Solomon set in motion the ability of the other editors to come along later and change the text for their own purposes. They were riding along in the shadow of Solomon.

In parallel to Solomon's text, there was a small group of prophets who were keeping the inspired text. We know them as men like Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah and Jeremiah.

The inspired writing of all these other men was done in inspired Paleo.

Solomon's writing was done in what we are now calling "Jebusite Paleo" which was used until Nebuchadnezzar's day.

After Nebuchadnezzar, Solomon's writing was kept in Hebrew. Those Jebusite Paleo and Hebrew documents also absorbed the writings of the later inspired prophets. So their writing would have gone through a conversion from the inspired Paleo to these other manuscript conventions, including spelling changes, divine name changes, and drawn letter forms.

In that absorption process, the divine name would be changed and their specific stories bulked up by later editors in various ways. This blog is adding another question to be asked of later editors. Which editors added the later inspired writers into the public canon of the Old Testament?

This "canon absorption work" allowed the texts of those later prophets to get transmitted down through history. Ezra is perhaps the most likely villainous editor to have done this work for the late writing of the inspired prophets.

It still remains the case that recovery of the original, letter perfect, manuscripts is theoretically possible from these messed up public copies of the text. That is what we are still working on. At times it feels like a never ending process to get there, but we continue to advance to that goal.

Shop Work

The 3d print farm has been doing a reprint of the remaining parts for the Vine exhibit. When we were traveling this past weekend, we showed the Vine exhibit off to our friends.

The big difference from last time was that the newly added part labels made the vine assembly quick and easy. Every part now has a label that was easily used to know where it went on the vine.

But, certain parts were impossible to assemble with correct nap because they were missing external nap marks.

This was the first time that the need for external nap marks was clearly seen. So far, nap marks on 3d printed parts have been covered up during final assembly. But the vine is assembled each time it is put up for display. So, certain nap marks on the vine are needed externally so those marks can be used for final assembly when they come out of storage to be displayed.

So once we were home I went through and added external nap marks to the trunk and branches on the Vine. I then went and reprinted those parts.

At the same time I cleaned up the copper pipe that is used inside the trunk. There was a rough edge on the top that needed to be filed off. I also changed tolerances for the trunk parts so they slip on the copper pipe with a minimum of force. I also tracked down tolerance issues that impacted how the trunk parts fit with the joints.

The flowers on the vine have a similar tolerance issue that will be fixed with more reprints next week.

This week, I have now turned my attention to getting the 3rd Voron printer kit assembled and running. I need to do this urgently so parts do not get lost in the shop, which we found was happening when we got back home.

Match Dates

We were watching this past Wednesday for various stories related to a replay of the high place sacrifice at the coronation of king Saul. We were also watching for any sort of Moses like sign related to a staff becoming a snake. This same set of stories had replayed at 911, so we were watching for possible echos of that event in current headline news.

We found reasonable fulfillment matches in this week's headlines. Let me start with the most dramatic, the fiery crash of an MD-11 freighter at Louisville, Kentucky.

1) NTSB Update On Kentucky MD-11 Crash

2) Another Update

The links here are to Juan Brown's Blancolirio channel on Youtube. The top is his commentary on the first NTSB update. The second link includes more updates and more video.

This crash happened around 5:15 local time on Tuesday, November 4, 2025. So after the sunset day-break in Capernaum, putting it on the 2025-11-05 prophetic calendar day for the replay of the high place sacrifice at the start of Saul's reign.

This crash is similar to the planes that took out the twin towers when this story replayed previously in 2001. In both cases, a high place sacrifice. In modern vocabulary, death by falling out of the sky. Fortunately, not as many died this time around.

The MD-11, previously known as the DC-10, has a terrible safety history compared to other planes of the same size. There are 2 design flaws that have plagued these planes since originally put in service. The first design problem involves the center engine, which is mounted in the tail. If that engine has a catastrophic failure, the internal damage to the tail can cause the rudder to become disabled. When that happens the pilot can no longer control the flight. The other design flaw is similar. If either of the wing mounted engines fail catastrophically in flight, then Flying Object Debra, FOD, can be sucked into the tail mounted engine causing it to fail too. So a single engine failure on the wing can cause catastrophic loss of the plane itself.

In this case it looks like the left engine failed catastrophically during take off. This looks to have damaged the tail engine so there was no hope of ever climbing after takeoff. The NTSB is working on the details and they will likely find some combination of trouble along these lines.

Other reports indicate that UPS is generally replacing employees with contractors, so there is motive, at least, for sabotage. The prophetic stories from 911 would suggest this is not a simple natural accident, but the actions of men.

Putin On National Unity Day

The link here is to an RT article dealing with Putin's speech on Russia's National Unity Day holiday. It was celebrated on November 4, 2025, and is a possible venue for a Moses like speech matching the sign of Moses's staff becoming a snake.

The holiday itself commemorates the events of 1612 when Russians gathered together to defend themselves from Polish and Lithuanian occupation. Russia had been occupied for 2 years. This 1612 date is at the same time as the seal date that identifies the lost tribe of Judah as Russia. So this holiday is generally commemorating Russia's seal date. The USA does the same, celebrating its own seal date, on July 4 each year.

The holiday was celebrated previously as commemorating the Russian Revolution, and had been celebrated that way for 70 years. The purpose of the holiday was changed in 2005.

There was nothing particularly noteworthy in that article dealing with Putin as Moses. It would become much more interesting the next morning.

Putin Directs Prep for Nuclear Tests

Perhaps the biggest headline for 2025-11-05 was a meeting at the Kremlin in the morning where various Russian military officials formally asked Putin to resume nuclear weapons testing. Putin generally agreed, and in reply to the request, asked for a formal plan for resumption of nuclear weapons testing by Russia. In particular to match any nuclear testing by the west.

Nuclear weapons also usually fall out of the sky, so this too is on the theme of a high place sacrifice. At this point only being planned.

This would also be the expected headline match to Moses' sign of a staff turning into a snake. Putin, of course, in the role of Moses. The story of staff and snake involves a fight between Moses and Pharaoh's officials, which is exactly how this headline is working. They are one-upping each other in terms of who can launch the most dangerous snake/weapon.

This meeting was in response to comments made by Trump on Air Force One on his way back from Asia which he repeated on Social media. Here is more...

RT Post On Trump

The link here is to an RT post with the Truth Social post included. Note that RT truth checks Trump. Until Trump said anything, Russia was still respecting the Nuclear Test Ban treaty. The USA is lawless, but ultimately Pharaoh is lawless, so the Jews who control the US government. This is how the world as we know it will end. Up in nuclear smoke.

FAA Slows Down Air Traffic

The link here is to a post on X detailing the FAA's plan on reducing air traffic in the USA because their air controllers are impacted by the US Government shutdown. Many controllers are said to be working without pay. Curiously, Air Traffic Controllers operate as a special class of critical government employees.

This is another headline directly matching events at 911 when this same prophetic story was replaying in headline news. In that case all air traffic was grounded. This time only a percentage is being grounded. This is another headline on the theme of falling out of the sky. The FAA is trying to prevent planes from falling from the sky.

Hal Turner posted a related article. No link, his material goes behind a pay wall. In any case La Guardia, one of the airports serving New York City, issued a full ground stop around midnight a day or so after the prophetic date.

This was in response to lack of staffing, apparently also of federal air traffic controllers. After 911 there was also a 4 day national full ground stop of all flights in the USA. This ground stop at NYC is another mild timed echo of 911. Also on the theme of trying to prevent death by falling from the sky.

Fall of Pokrovsk

The link here is to a Military Summary channel video on Youtube. It provides some details on the fall of Pokrovsk to the Russians in eastern Ukraine. This is not a fall from the sky, but it is a military fall in the war venue between the western, NATO, Zionists and Christian Russians.

This is a slow motion headline that has been going on for days. Because of the fog of war this is not as easy to precisely date, but should be on our list of likely fulfillment venues. This is most likely the venue to match the loss of 3000 people as happened at 911. In this case the loss of 3000 Ukrainian soldiers. We will probably not know the exact numbers of dead in this cauldron until after the war.

Mamdani Wins NYC Mayoral Race

New York City elected a new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, on Tuesday, November 4, 2025. This was a day head of the expected prophetic date, but close enough. He is both a Democrat and Socialist and a Muslim.

To quote Wikipedia, "Mamdani campaigned on an affordability-focused platform in support of fare-free city buses, public child care, city-owned grocery stores, LGBTQ rights, a rent freeze on rent-stabilized units, additional affordable housing units, comprehensive public safety reform, and a $30 minimum wage by 2030. Mamdani also supports tax increases on corporations and those earning above $1 million annually. Mamdani is the first Indian American, first South Asian, first Muslim, second democratic socialist after David Dinkins, and first millennial mayor-elect of New York City."

Given the matched venue to the 911 events which we are repeating again, this becomes an interesting additional headline. This is something of an anti-Christ election victory. Think dancing Israelis.

Death of Dick Cheney

Dick Cheney was US Vice President during the events of 911. He had previously run the Pentagon during the First Persian Gulf war. (Itself an important Noah's flood replay event on the series leading up to 911.) The link here is to his long biography on Wikipedia, which is sanitized for young minds.

Cheney was directing many of the operations that escalated in the months after 911, including the Patriot Act, false weapons of mass destruction evidence presented at the UN, as well as the eventual invasion of Iraq because, of course, it was Saudi pilots on the 911 planes.

In any case, a curious timing match to this run of the same prophetic story.

Watch Dates

I only expect the Kings related dates that also match the plagues on Egypt to be interesting from now through early 2027.

But, for completeness, and to watch to see if my hunch is correct, let me keep posting a few other dates as we go along so we know for sure this hunch is correct.

2025-11-08, the Saturday after this blog goes out, is the replay of the first year of David's life. See 2 Samuel 2:11 for one of the cites. No obvious headline stories would be expected.

Other Headlines

The following general headlines caught my attention this week.

Stanislav Krapivnik

The link here is to a Glenn Diesen video on Youtube. Glenn's guest is Stanislav Krapivnik, who was born in Russia but came to the USA as a child. He served in the US Army.

I am always looking for videos that can explain how Orthodox Christianity informs modern Russia's actions in world affairs. Many commentators have indicated that this religion does indeed inform political action, but few can articulate exactly how. Our regular western commentators never want to touch on religious issues so they are deaf and dumb relative to Russia.

This particular video covers a wide ranging series of topics related to the war in Ukraine. Many of the points covered are not that particularly new, but we are getting to the point where the Ukrainian Army won't be able to maintain coherence much longer, so this is an interesting discussion.

But, what causes me to link that video here in the blog is that Stanislav explains how Russian Orthodox Christianity is different than western Christianity in terms of understanding war. This is a big deal and we cannot understand Russia and Russians without getting our head around it.

In western Christianity there is the idea of a "just war." This theology was probably created by Zionists, because they want to conquer the world, European kings could not do that without creating wars. But, I digress. Stanislav explains that in Orthodox Christianity war is ALWAYS a sin. There is no just war. This limits wars of offense and it informs how to respond in wars of defense.

This difference in understanding of war explains Russian military actions across much of the past 1000 years. The Christian Russian kings generally never went looking for war. They were never out conquering Europe. But, when war came, Russians saw this as being pulled into sin by the actions of another nation.

In response to this type of provocation the Russian's would fight hard so their enemies would not want to do it again. Stanislav gives many examples, starting from the year 1012 coming forward. He explains how the Russians generally did not fight the "Great Game" that informed much of European history. There was Russian territorial expansion, especially south, but usually because the Russians were defending themselves in wars they did not start.

Stanislav explains the general Russian public, and the military, has already mentally crossed this "sin" line when thinking about Ukraine. Russia has been pulled into sin by the actions of westerners.

Putin is generally holding back the war making machinery of the Russian government and the Russian public's desire to fix this problem by war.

Putin is trying to save many lives through a lasting diplomatic answer. Trump is a dumb-shit who does not know many people will die by Trump's own refusal to help Putin end this war. Trump's Zionist masters are a death-cult and do not care. Think Lindsay Graham for but 1 example, Netanyahu for another.

Stanislav gives some examples to drive this point home. This is a very, very interesting insight that we may be able to use to explain future headlines, especially when this goes nuclear a few years out.

More Later,

Phil