Two Tents

This blog addresses a contradiction that inadvertently showed up in last week's blog. Before that, more current status on Psalms work. Finally, shop notes and a headline review.

400

This week Ryan continued his work on Psalms. The best place to see this is across the Psalms row in the Table of 400. He has sketched in a set of candidate psalms for the first half of that row. These are stories 300 through 312.

As with other runs of stories, the key used to crack this set was to watch for matched stories found in the rows that go with each story in this row.

This first half of Psalms are selected from Psalm 1 through 37 in the Book of Psalms as found in stock bibles. The second half of this Psalms row is much more difficult because there is a longer set of possible psalms from which to pick. Inspired psalms appear to be spread out more than at the start.

This work caused Ryan to get a better understanding of Solomon as the first editor. Likely Solomon seriously bulked up the historical stories that lead up to and include Solomon's construction of the first temple.

Solomon was introducing a new state religion that included blood sacrifice. He was also building up a formal government, with a seat of government, his "palace." He appears to have written in back stories to support his changes. Solomon also appears to have more extensively documented these events than the inspired writers cared to discuss.

Ryan has stopped with immediate work on Psalms and has turned back to looking for Solomon edits in the Kings I row, the Fe row, starting at story 125. Watch for more work there in future weeks.

Contradiction Last Week

In last week's blog I covered the 3 big Bible studies that matter for understanding our work. I also gave watch dates, especially a 20 day replay of the 20 years when the ark was at Kiriath Jearim.

When I was proof reading the blog Friday afternoon I realized there was a subtle but interesting contradiction being exposed by what I had written in that blog. Acts 15 cannot be properly interpreted without thinking about those 20 years when the ark was at Kiriath Jearim.

Friday afternoon was already late in the week and I decided to leave it alone, and return to that subject this week, exploring the problem a little more.

If you did not see the contradiction yourself when reading that blog, you may want to stop and think about it a little before continuing here.

Amos 9:11-12 (BRB)

Acts 15 includes a quote of a passage from Amos 9:11-12 which is linked here. If you follow this down you will see that Amos is generally dealing with the Assyrian deportation. Depending on possible edits, it is perhaps dealing with the return of the Jews as the world witnessed in 1948.

We can debate the best cut and application of Amos 9, which I will return to below, but we must first see that this passage in Amos is NOT dealing with the Tent of Time nor with the exhibits within that tent.

The writers of Acts 15, dealing with the interference from the religious leaders at Jerusalem, cannot have been quoting Amos for the purpose of pointing at Moses' Tent of Time.

When Ryan and I first understood Acts 15 we took "David's Fallen Tent" to be the Tent of Time as set up in Moses' day with the help of Joshua son of Nun. We knew of no other possible tent, yet Amos appears to be referencing some other fallen tent.

Making matters worse are the timeline references we are now in, that started replaying on October 16, 2025. The story for these now 20 days involves how the ark had been taken away from the tent as it stood in Eli's day in order to be used as a weapon.

It did not work as a weapon. Instead the ark was captured. The Philistines had trouble which they attributed to the ark and so returned the ark on a cart. The ark then remained at Kiriath Jearim for another 20 years. The 20 days we are in now.

Note carefully how the ark was not returned to be part of the other exhibits in the Tent of Time. The ark was now on a different trajectory.

Ark To The Temple

Finishing off what we probably know about the ark, it was eventually brought to Jerusalem by David. (Or else as invented by Solomon. This is a complex problem.) The ark then became the center piece of Solomon's new temple, being kept in a secret room at the back of the main room in that building.

The story of putting the items into Solomon's temple is given in 1 Kings 8:3-9. Within that passage there is a reference to both the ark being put into the holy of holies and the "holy vessels" from the tent of time also brought into the temple. See 1 Kings 8:4.

Let me argue that the ark was the prize, the centerpiece for the building. Whatever those other vessels may have been, they were not the standard alphabet exhibits. Used correctly, the inspired objects would prove Solomon's writing as false. So he would not be capturing them in his temple, at least not for their intended purpose. Solomon may be making a claim that his other vessels were from the era of Moses, even if they were not. Solomon did likely edit Moses to create a false history for those items.

The ark became the centerpiece for the temple system perhaps all the way through the New Testament era. It was probably redecorated, with cherubim and wings, in order to fit Solomon's religion.

There are disputes all along this general trajectory. Some dispute the ark was actually in the temple. That back room may have just been empty. Nobody was allowed to go there, and that rule may have been covering some secret like there was no ark. In any case, these disputes are beyond our scope here.

Artifacts To Samuel

So what became of the rest of the real artifacts that made up the Tent of Time? The artifacts that prove inspired writing? Solomon had no particular use for those.

Samuel, as a young man, was raised in whatever remained of the Tent of Time in Eli's day. There is the famous 4 calls of Samuel in the dark. Samuel first thought it was Eli calling, but later figured out it was Joshua.

We don't know anything of how Samuel was raised, but we next find him after those 20 years when the ark was in Kiriath Jearim. At that point he is a well known prophet and is officiating, eventually the coronation, of Saul.

We now understand the other artifacts that made up the Moses era Tent of Time are required in order to write and verify inspired scripture. This would be going on in Samuel's day. He wrote Judges and Samuel. But all the other writers, all the way down to Jeremiah and beyond also needed those artifacts.

Job appears to have been tasked with rebuilding a set from memory. Jonah probably made a copy to carry to Nineveh. But everyone else in the chain simply passed on what they had inherited.

So the Tent of Time, at least the interior exhibits, in whatever form it may have taken, was NOT something in David's possession. The remnant was in Samuel's care, and then passed through the other writing prophets down through history. The cave purchased by Jeremiah was likely the final resting place before being recovered by Joshua in the New Testament times.

So What is David's Tent?

David was not the first king. Saul was the first king, coronated by Samuel. David was from Judah, even Bethlehem of Judah, very near Jerusalem. David first reigned in Hebron. Once Saul was dead, there was fighting over the Jerusalem throne. Eventually, David was given rule over the combined kingdom and he moved his throne to Jerusalem.

The Book of Amos wants David to match some sort of tent. Was David's rule itself some sort of tent? Did something happen to that tent when David died? Did David's tent go away when David died?

Answering these questions is not easy. The text does not really say.

But there are some historical clues. Immediately after the death of David, Solomon would build BOTH a temple and a palace. The temple took 7 years to complete. The palace another 13.

Solomon was conceiving of the world as a religious world, centered at the temple, and a governmental world, centered at his palace. In modern vocabulary, we would call Solomon's palace a capital building. We know a form of this as the separation of Church and State.

This distinction would stretch forward across history. In London, the state church is across the street from the seat of British government.

There may also be evidence as far back as Moses that there were 2 tents. The Tent of Time was setup away from the camp. Something else was setup in the camp. There are strange issues with specific vocabulary words here, and the distinction is not really clear in English translations.

The religious side of this gets even stranger. Micah 4:4 is one of several places that discuss how everyone will sit under their own vine and fig tree. This is a marker for the Tent of Time exhibits being so widely distributed that anyone who wants a copy will have a copy. We still await that day.

David's Rule

In any case, David's fallen tent, as given in Amos and Acts, appears to be indicating David's rule. Not by the man, but by David's TRIBE which meets in a tent, what in modern times is a capital building. David's tent will rule over the lost tribes.

The Revelation 7 list of tribes puts Judah first. So Revelation 7 puts Russia first. I suspect the Amos prophecy is pointing at how Russia will eventually win the upcoming world war, and Russia's goal of planetary multi-polarity will become the dominant form of international relations.

Returning to the Acts 15 story. The writers of that chapter seem to be quoting the Amos passage to indicate that there will be trouble with visitors barging in on their meetings until such a time as Judah one day rules again.

By that they are picking up subtle themes from many other passages that Judah, so Russia, will eventually fix this problem. Until Russia does fix this problem, the rest of us will always have trouble with Zionists messing with the text.

Unfortunately, the timeline for that was 2000+ years forward from their day. The writers of Acts 15 knew this, they knew the prophetic timeline, they had the crown exhibit, so they knew this would be well beyond their current day.

So the rest of Acts 15 is dealing with the editors since for 2000 years the only possible public copies of the text will be edited by the Jerusalem based editors starting at Solomon. The only way to find the inspired story, the base story, of the text is to learn the editors and their additions.

The rest of Acts 15 works as we have always suspected. It then gives the rules needed to spot additions in the base text given a standard Bible Study. This is the work Ryan is doing.

Watch Dates

This past week we transitioned into the 20 years when the ark was in Kiriath Jearim.

We remain in this period until November 5, 2025. More on that next prophetic date as we get closer.

The main headline event here at the end of Eli involved the travels of US President Trump. He appears to have put an end to most of the genocide in Gaza. This is a good thing, especially if it can hold back Israel even a few weeks.

War has been going on in Gaza since October of 2023. The prophetic story for Eli this week involved war against the Philistines. Unclear who should be considered the Philistines this time around, but accept Gaza for now.

So Trump "ending the war" is a good match to the prophetic stories expected this week. This is mostly a talking event, and nobody expects Trump's 22 point plan to be followed by anyone. This looks like a way for Israel to conquer Gaza using European help and try and convince the public something is being done.

Trump's trip appears to be from political pressure caused by the death of Charlie Kirk. The brand damage to Israel and to the Trump presidency was getting so extreme that something needed to be done.

Numerous reports from sources in Israel indicate this is just a pause in the genocide until the political winds calm down. Various other reports indicate no support for Israel from Americans under the age of 30. This is a problem come elections next year. Since AIPAC controls both of the political parties this is not a problem for Israel, but it is a problem for Trump. This trip appears to have been Trump's attempt at fixing various parts of this problem.

Trump traveled to Israel for an address on Monday, October 13, 2025, at the Israeli Knesset. The highlight was off-script when he called out the big Jewish donors who control the US government and US elections. This may have been intentional to show the US public that their fears are well grounded. Links to some video on this follow in the headline review section below.

Trump then traveled to Egypt for another meeting with Arab leaders. He gave another speech and called out various leaders, including EU leaders. This was also widely considered to be an intentional belittlement of the EU.

Iran, importantly, refused to attend, unable to trust the USA nor Israel. Many have been waiting for Israel to start a war with Iran. That began this week too, with war against Pakistan from Afghanistan. Pakistan is expected to fall so that the Pakistan army can be redirected to invade Iran on the ground.

The Houthis in Yemen stopped targeting Red Sea shipping because they consider Gaza to no longer be at war. We will see how long that lasts.

Trump did not spend a night on the ground, instead he got back on Air Force One and returned to DC. I suspect his team could not provide overnight safety for Trump. It was best to fly in and fly out all on the same day.

Trump's next action was to award a medal to Charlie Kirk, which was accepted by his wife. This brings the "son of Eli" into the prophetic date window for this week, helping to establish Kirk as a prophetic match for a dead son of Eli. The award ceremony looks to be the headline for the last day of Eli.

Buried within these prophetic stories is a reference to a 7 month time when the ark is with the Philistines. This may be indicating that the current Gaza situation is stable for 7 months. It may be timing trouble for Trump as Eli. In the end, Trump angered many mob bosses, any of which may now be planning to take him out.

Shop Work

The 3d print farm was turned to working on a reprint of the Table exhibit. By the time this blog goes out the Lid, Birds, Bird cages and most Dogs should be finished. Watch for pics on Telegram.

This week I also received new electrical parts for a 3rd revision of the lamp wiring. As the lamp was the first exhibit, this has been through more revisions than any of the other exhibits.

These new lamp parts are called "tea lights" which are rechargeable battery operated candles. This will allow a much cleaner lamp design without interior wiring. So the joints can be eliminated making the lamp much more slender. I also now understand exhibit color schemes and the lamp base will be radically different.

Headline Review

The following headlines caught my eye this week.

Charlie Kirk Medal of Freedom

Full Ceremony

This first link is to an RT post on X with some photos of the Charlie Kirk Medal of Freedom. It was received by his wife at the White House. The photos of the medal show the standard 666, or 6 sided star of David. Can't make this stuff up.

This second link is to the full ceremony at the White House in Washington DC on October 14, 2025. This is only off by 1 calendar day, so within normal tolerance for a fulfillment ceremony.

Settlements In Gaza

The link here is to a Going Underground post on X, the greater Israel genocide in Gaza is only paused, expect settlements in Gaza eventually.

Trump's Full Knesset Speech

The link here is to a Youtube video of Trump's full speech before the Israeli Knesset. Quite a Jew.

The link here is to a Lord Bebo post on X with the main photo of the leaders assembled at Sharm El Sheikh. Other commentators indicted that Netanyahu was not present because he might be forced to shake hands with some of the leaders in the room. Previous Israeli leaders have been assassinated over similar handshakes.

George Galloway On Trump's Trip

The link here is to a clip on the George Galloway channel on Youtube. In this 17 minute monologue he goes through all the political nuance that surrounded Trump on his trip. In particular how Trump works for wealthy Jews and how European leaders are American vassals.

Holy Cross Monastery

The link here is to a Youtube video with an introduction to the Holy Cross Monastery in West Virginia. This is a followup to the Mount Athos videos that I have included in previous blogs. Christian Orthodoxy is growing in the USA in part because of the Zionist corruption of Protestantism. Good for them.

Nick Fuentes on Based Lore

Nick Fuentes has become interesting to Ryan and I because Nick deals with subjects that are very similar to our own. How Nick has been banned marks how we will be, at least once we start discussing our work more broadly.

The link here is an interesting example of what is happening with Nick. Because he has been banned by most social platforms, he has become rare, hard to find, and thus much more valuable as a media personality. This is an odd effect. He is now being clipped by a hoard of smaller channels that are using Nick in order to increase their own subscribe counts. Dave Smith also had Nick on and Dave commented later after a huge number of views, that Nick provided Dave with a platform, not the other way around, even though Nick was the guest on Dave's channel.

More Later,

Phil