Micah

This blog looks again at the story of Micah. Before that, an update on the Divine Name related edits that began at Tabernacles. Also, there is a sketch about a theory for changes in the spellings of Paleo names. Then notes on Ratcliffe's trip to Moscow, our expected headline this week. Then finally, a general headline review.

Story Grid

Ryan continues to make an editing pass across the OT. He is cleaning up references to Joshua. This pass is making OT based material in the TT app read more like the New Testament. Individual parties in the OT now look to interact with Joshua in ways that are similar to what we see in the NT.

The link here is to the Story Grid app. With this week's deploy, the updates are down through story 399, though there are patchy spots that need more attention earlier in the grid. This update is also found in the other apps, so the TT and SR.

Plot Changes

These updates reveal a plot across this material related to how well the public knows Joshua. Awareness peaks at the crossing of the Jordan. It collapses after Samuel, especially once we reach the first editor, Solomon.

Once we get beyond Solomon and his construction of the Temple to Yahweh, we now find stories where Joshua is known to individuals, but not as acknowledged publicly. So following Joshua becomes more like an underground faith, not a public faith.

Until the Assyrian deportation, the keepers of that faith appear to be a more or less well known tradition of prophets. That community of prophets appears to be caring for a larger community of faith. There is a reference in 1 Kings 19:18 where Elijah is told there is a group of 7,000 who have not bowed to "Baal." Presumably this is the community of faith that Joshua was caring for, and why he was preventing the Assyrian Deportation.

This is cited in Romans 11:4. In that NT cite we see that early NT era believers were also a small remnant. So these 2 different eras in history, very roughly about 1000 years apart, were functioning similarly.

Presumably the NT era community survived until Ananias' edits took hold. Really until that community became walk offs. The OT era faith community had presumably mostly become walk offs by the time of the Assyrian deportation.

So it is in this world that we read about the story of Micah. This prophet is one of the prophets that appear to hold together that ancient community of faith. He is called to an audience with the kings of Jerusalem and Samaria who are discussing going to war.

Micah Called

The link here is to Book 15, story 157 in the TT app. This app is linked off of Paleo.In. As the app is currently under development, this link is not permanent. It is fine this week. Future readers of this blog should search for "Micah" in the app in order to find this story.

In this story, Jehoshaphat, the king at Jerusalem, has gone to visit Ahab in Samaria. These 2 kingdoms were in a permanent state of attempting to recreate the unified kingdom. They would never be successful. The split in the kingdom itself was a consequence of Solomon and his temple. Joshua enforced the split for as long as Samaria remained.

In this story Ahab proposes going to war with Ramoth Gilead. Ramoth, by the way, in Paleo, is pronounced like the English word "Remote." It probably has the same meaning. This name implies a distant place, so at some edge of the territory. There is a natural implication that getting there is not as easy as some nearby location. This will not be a police operation, but a military operation.

Ahab has married Jezebel, so Ahab is farther from the historical faith than Jehoshaphat. Jehoshaphat wants Joshua's true word on the wisdom of going to war. He asks Ahab if there are any prophets around. There is. But Ahab does not like Micah because he always prophecies something bad. No matter, Micah is called.

Remnant Faith

So at this point we can see how a remnant with faith functions in an otherwise faithless kingdom. Even the Jerusalem king, an heir of Solomon, still knows of Joshua. He still knows Joshua speaks through prophets.

This implies, by the way, that this king also knows the Yahweh god at the temple in Jerusalem is just theater. This also implies the king has some sort of stage presence when it comes to activities around the Jerusalem temple. But he also knows how to get real answers from Joshua when it matters.

This story may be giving us some insight into the Apostle Paul. Paul was out of Benjamin. He was well versed in the Yahweh false religion. He encounters Joshua on the road to Damascus. At that point Paul also starts to live his life knowing the difference between these 2 systems. This may be why Paul was such an effective evangelist. This may also be why he was so hated at Jerusalem.

For us today, we can imagine the same problem. Our edited New Testament lets us know that Joshua exists. But Joshua's purposes on earth and his patterns of life are hidden. Fixing the edits will create a similar distinction. Some will know Joshua correctly, like Micah, and some will not, like Ahab. Some will be in the middle, knowing of Joshua, like Jehoshaphat.

So Micah knows Joshua. Micah is known for being able to speak on Joshua's behalf. Micah is brought to the king's party. Micah then runs into yet another problem.

False Prophets

As the story unfolds we learn there are 400 local prophets who tell the kings that they should go to battle, and that those kings will be victorious.

Micah is told that he needs to prophecy the same way. He is told to tell the king that he will be victorious.

Micah, of course, cannot just go along with the crowd. 1 Kings 22:14 is the original cite. Whatever Joshua says, that is what Micah will speak. Nothing else. But, in this case, Micah, in an apparently mocking tone, goes along with the 400. Those 400 will not know Joshua. They do not know that Joshua speaks. This is why they would tell Micah what to say.

The king Jehoshaphat knows Micah is mocking. The king asks again. Micah then gives Joshua's word, that every man should return to his own house in peace.

This is very typical of the way Joshua speaks. The answer is not about the same subject. They had asked about victory. The problem is the assembly itself. The visiting king needs to go home. The 400 prophets need to go home. The whole place needs to disband.

Many, many times, I have seen Joshua answer questions in a similar structure. The question itself is far away from the real issue. Everything about the context where the question is being asked is trouble.

Joshua's answers to prayer often reset the context around problems rather than solving the problem at hand.

Bigger Plans, Deeper Problem

Micah then goes on, and explains how the entire assembly of 400 false prophets is actually doing Joshua's bidding. They are Joshua's plan for how Ahab will go to his death.

This is something like a text book example of how Joshua uses false religion. Even though these false prophets are false, they are still unable to escape the problem that they are simply carrying out a task that has been ordained for them.

This is another layer of insight. Those prophets think they are doing the right thing. They are practicing the "state religion" of Samaria. But they are following a lie. In the end, their lie will still achieve the goal Joshua had in getting rid of Ahab.

The same is actually true of Jerusalem itself. The difference, at least in this context, is that Jehoshaphat knows the state religion at Jerusalem is false. Jehoshaphat can at least reach a true prophet when he has need.

It does not really matter to Joshua that the culture at large does not really know him. Joshua interacts with his remnant. There is always some set of souls, say 7000, that he is currently bringing to full spiritual development. The rest is just the stage where that activity happens.

How About Now?

These same patterns go on now too. What is different now is that there are no true prophets. The text is closed. There are only limited prophetic gifts. There are a few people who operate in ways similar to Micah. But, unlike Micah, nobody these days has access to inspired text. All of us are in some sort of soul holding pattern. This was also true leading up to the New Testament era.

Other patterns of our day are quite similar to the patterns in Micah's day. There are many utterly false prophets who follow lies. There are also fictional systems of belief that are all across the globe.

Joshua, though, is also very real. He alone can answer prayer. He can send his angels. He can step in and rescue. He is still following a long term plan for history. He he still developing souls. We can also seek him out and ask him questions.

Hopefully, here soon, the text will be opened and we can get out of a 1900 year long soul holding pattern.

Names Work

This week I have continued to work on the names annex to the Paleo Lexicon. This week's work was mostly verification of entries from the previous few weeks. Cleaning data as early as possible in long pipelines makes later stages easier.

The main focus this week has been to gather words into what becomes lexicon entries based on roots. Roots don't come to us clean. Different places in the text have different added vowels for the same words. So names found in different places, with different spellings, will still belong in the same lexicon entry. Like a puzzle, they need to be combined.

For some words the number of spelling variations is excessive. Nobody seems to have agreed on how to spell "Israel" for example. The word itself may not be inspired at all, so perhaps every editor had a different idea on how to spell that word.

In any case, here in this blog, I want to start sketching out a possible theoretical framework for how and when some of these names were changed. Especially interesting to me are NT names.

For very early names, Enoch, Noah and so on, we only know those names by the spelling found in ancient texts. For New Testament names there are parallel witnesses to those names. So New Testament names can be used to understand certain interesting features in the Paleo language.

Starting Point

The New Testament was likely written by a group of authors sometime before, say, the year 50 AD. We don't (yet) exactly know when Paul arrived in Rome. We suspect his court case before Caesar contributed to the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. So the dating of the tail of Paul's arrival in Rome is ultimately what dates the last bit of inspired writing.

Original readers of the inspired NT will have been using Paleo. This is true because the ciphered documents are in this language. All of the exhibits are built to support this language.

From this base document for the NT we end up with the extant Aramaic texts that are passed down through history.

Our Aramaic professor on Youtube does not think those documents were inspired because there are "Greekisms" in the Aramaic. He dates the preparation of the current Aramaic New Testament as having happened out in the 100s. He places it perhaps up in what is now Turkey. So a century after they were originally written, and far away.

So let me propose a theory for how the texts moved from inspired Paleo to the extant Aramaic. This theory involves various steps.

Step 1: Authorship

Original authors are going to prepare audited Paleo texts. Once known to pass audit they will have been ciphered. Very early faith communities would know these documents. They are scripture. They add to the inspired version of the OT that had been recovered by Joshua and his early disciples.

The Megiddo Mosaic floor is an example of a place likely from one of those early faith communities. They will have possessed the entire inspired library. This includes base texts and ciphers.

Step 2: Editing

Within Ananias' lifetime, so likely before 70 AD, he will have taken the original NT texts and edited them to something approaching the current modern form. He probably did this in Greek, with a Greek translation.

Ananias' purpose would have been to prevent the Paleo faith community from reaching the Greeks. This is called "front running." Zionists do this all the time, even now. This is why they so often want to control media.

This work would provided a language and conceptual barrier that would stop missions work by people like Paul. This would produce an artificial Greek faith, outside of the Hebrew communities located in and around Jerusalem. So Ananias was protecting his priestly power by deflecting Christianity into the Greek speaking world. He was also creating an appendage to the edited Old Testament. His edits were feathering with the Hebrew OT.

Step 3: Aramaic

The basic Paleo language system appears to be the same as Aramaic. Letter forms are basically the only difference. So a transcription to Aramaic from Paleo is an obvious first step. This, of course, breaks from the exhibits. But it does let someone who can only read Aramaic then read the NT text. So this would not be done by the early faith community. But it would make sense for someone to carry out. Local scroll shops, for example, could have done this.

This seems to have been an important step. This is especially so if recovery back to paleo is ever going to be possible. Looser translations do not look recoverable. The ability to recover the text is part of the promises about the text. So a transcription must have happened early on.

Step 4: Uplift

So at some point later, say in the 100s, the Greek NT texts, which are far longer than the transcribed Aramaic, will need to be used to uplift the original Aramaic work to match the Greek based editing. The Aramaic Christian church is going to mostly match the Greek Christian church because the basic texts become the same canon, just in different languages.

The expected uplift pattern would be to take the extant, but short, Aramaic NT and expand it to contain all of Ananias' Greek edits. This appears to be the work that is known to have happened in the 100s. This step would explain the "Greekisms" found in the text. When done as an uplift to an earlier Aramaic text, it would still allow recovery through use of the audit.

Linguistic Limitation

The Paleo language system does not need nor use written vowels. The vowels themselves come from the top side of the silver set of 3d models.

As I study spelled names, especially NT names, I can see heavy and irregular use of added vowels. Why would this be so?

The Paleo writing system appears to be using implied vowels so that the letter string can go through ciphers. Each Paleo letter looks more like a small syllable rather than a simple letter. Ethiopian languages still work this way. Those syllables are what get ciphered.

The Paleo language pays a price for this design choice. The Paleo language cannot express every combination of consonant and vowel. Indeed, the language is limited to only 6 pronounced vowels. Each consonant only has 1 vowel. Most humans can detect as many as 16 vowels, but they need to be trained beyond about 8 vowels. The human vocal track has certain primary vowels which is were we find the inspired vowels.

Earlier this year we looked closely at the Ethiopian Bible. Turns out, the Ethiopian languages solved this same problem of breaking fixed consonant/vowel pairing by adding shapes, so syllables, to their alphabet.

Essentially all other phonetic languages use special letters to mark vowels. When there are not enough letters, they often add accent marks to their basic vowels. English is one of the very few languages without marks on vowels.

So by design, each Paleo letter is limited to only 1 trailing vowel sound. When those trailing vowels sounds are not vocalized, the listener knows this is a word break.

Adapting Paleo

The people and places described in the New Testament narrative had actual Latin, Greek, Hebrew and perhaps Aramaic names. Those language systems are more expressive than Paleo. In those languages, vowels are combined with consonants more or less at will.

So the inspired authors would have been generating short form, Paleo, names for the characters that they were writing about. They had no choice. This was a design limit of inspired writing. It is the setup needed for writing stories that can go through ciphers.

So in the 100s, when Aramaic with implied vowels is forced to adjust to Greek names, the scribes doing this work need to break standard Paleo. This breakage hides any ability to cipher. But ciphers do not matter at this point. They are including non-inspired text to conform to Ananias' edited text. The entire exhibit system was lost as well. They are creating church as we know it for an Aramaic audience.

Scribes working the "uplift" stage can then use added vowels to more accurately reflect the sound systems used for original names. The short forms used by inspired writers gets lost.

I have seen this breakage of standard Paleo names across the entire names lexicon, but especially with New Testament names. It is best to show this problem using an example.

Name: Philip

Let me use Philip for this example. The absolute shortest possible Paleo version of this name is Fe-Lu-Pe. It could be Pe-Lu-Pe if the Ph, so f, sound does not need to match in the Paleo form.

But, the Aramaic version of the Greek version of this name is "Pe-Yo-Lu-Yo-Pe-Ve-Sa." Instead of the natural 3 letter minimum, we find 7 letters in Aramaic text passed by history. So this is the spelling that shows up in the names Lexicon for Philip in the NT.

Every other letter, so 3 of those 7 letters, are functioning as an added vowel. There is also a final Paleo Sa letter which does not currently get pronounced. That final Sa does not transmit into English translations of the NT. We know this character as Philip not as Philipus.

I don't yet have the NT text through audit. But, if Paleo names across the OT and NT are similar, then names like Philip should reduce to 3 or perhaps 4 letters, Someone probably added 3 or 4 letters to this name.

They were adding vowels because they were using Aramaic letters to override whatever they knew as the default vowel sounds for this name. The 3 letter version of Fe-Lu-Pe is pronounced "Feeloop." These vowels are not the same as we know for Philip. This is an example of what inspired writers were doing to all names. This limited power of the Paleo vowel sound system is what the scribes doing the uplift were fighting.

They probably added 2 copies of Yo to the basic name. Yo, by the way, seems to very commonly be used to mark an "i" in names. "Ve" is commonly used to mark a "u." The "Sa" ending is applied inconsistently. Some NT names use this as a suffix, some don't. So the paleo version, with 7 letters, so Yo as i, comes to English as "Pilipus." By convention, outside of the spelling, the first Pe is the f sound. The second Pe is the p sound.

This suggests, that the ancient pronunciation on Philip was probably "Pilip." The Ph shift presumably came later than first century.

When the Aramaic texts were uplifted to match Ananias' edited Greek, these sorts of things were going on at a linguistic level. Unnatural vowel usage appears to be the final result. Nearly every name that was not already in the OT has this going on.

The OT names are not that unnatural to us because we only know the names as given in the text. We don't know what the street pronunciation was for names like Jacob, Noah or Enoch. The NT is unique in this problem.

Linguistic Clues

This is the work that was probably going on in the 100s. This is what creates the "Greekisms" that modern professors of Aramaic can call out. Most Greek names, when viewed in Aramaic, look like loan words that have been respelled in order to capture specific vowel sounds. These become at least 1 class of Greekisms. I can see that pattern myself. I can see that same pattern everywhere across the NT names lexicon.

Work Plan

Almost every name across the entire text appears to have added vowels. I can identify this pattern by counting pronounced syllables in English versions of names.

So the work item that naturally springs from this is to run the audit against all names. The general odds of passing audit get better as the length of the name goes down. Pe-Lu-Pe stands much better odds at passing audit than does "Pe-Yo-Lu-Yo-Pe-Ve-Sa."

The next step is to attempt to audit otherwise short sentences that also include names. These combinations should shake out added vowels across the lexicon itself.

This is the work item ahead, hopefully soon. More later.

Match Dates

We were watching this past Wednesday, so 2026-08-26, for something related to a prophetic replay of the coronation of a new king in Samaria. This was a northern king, so what is now Europe and the USA.

The main headline for this date appears to be US CIA director Ratcliffe making a strange trip to Moscow on Tuesday, the day before. Think of Ratcliffe as a new king, suddenly making an appearance on the scene, so matching the expected story.

Ratcliffe is thought to be the actual man in charge of the war in Ukraine against Russia. He is most likely still working for others, say Zionist bankers, but anyone higher than him will be outside of standard government. The CIA itself is part of the shadow government that runs the USA. It is also the biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world.

Earlier diplomatic trips have involved meetings with Russians. Perhaps the most well known was the trip to Alaska where Trump met with Putin. Most reporting from nearly all such diplomatic contacts have involved the west wanting a cease fire in Ukraine so that the west could rearm Ukraine in order to continue the Ukraine war with Russia after rearming.

It has taken awhile, but Russia are now wise to that ruse. Russia will not stop their side of the war until Ukraine either surrenders or falls to the Russian army. The Russian military is on the advantage.

Ukraine is not expected to have winter heating in most apartment blocks, nor electricity, this coming winter. War may become nearly impossible to fight on the Ukrainian side as soon as it gets cold.

Adding a little complexity, Putin is up for reelection in September, so he is being unusually careful with how he deals with the Ukraine war in order to not upset that vote. He appears to be avoiding sound bites that could be picked up in the election coverage.

Showmanship

Ratcliffe is interesting because he has not been overtly involved. So this is a new king. A peculiar feature of this trip was the use of a C-17 military transport. This generated interesting social media videos. This large plane also carried the vehicles for a motorcade that drove into Moscow. This is also more public performance. There was video of American license plates on those vehicles.

Ratcliffe clearly wanted to be seen. He wanted the world to know he was there.

The Ukrainians had stopped attacks on Russia for 3 days in order to allow this trip. (So through the prophetic date, more confirmation of the prophetic match.) Normal diplomatic missions, say earlier trips with Kushner and Witkoff, would use a corporate jet. Not here. Ratcliffe was most likely putting on a show for his banking bosses.

Subject?

Commentary on the trip suggested that Ratcliffe was probably again trying to threaten the Russians into a cease fire of some sort. Depending on the source, there is dispute if Ratcliffe met Putin or not. Russian media said no. Some alternative media says yes, but that Putin only gave a 1 sentence answer, no.

Other commentary indicated Ratcliffe was threatening Russia to cut ties to Iran. As the Ukraine war and the Iran war are 2 fronts on the same war to conquer the world, this was probably also discussed. But this may be deflection. Russia does not appear to be key in Iran. China is more central to supporting Iran than Russia.

Follow Up

There were also reports that Ratcliffe returned to DC after his visit to Moscow. He is said to have spent 3 hours at the White House, briefing other officials over how the trip had gone. If Ratcliffe is really the man running the war, he may have been giving directions to the US side over what happens next.

Ukraine has serious reasons to be worried over winter. There are now more stirrings across Europe over the need to get involved in Ukraine. The UK just relaxed their 3 percent ceiling on defense spending in order to fund their own war against Russia. The UK, prophetic Babel, should take the brunt of the war once Ukraine falls.

Watch Dates

We are now clear of known prophetic dates through 2026-10-02, which will be the end of Jotham's reign. Until then, we look for a king living in seclusion, and any possible headlines related to nuclear related weapons and related threats.

Perhaps Ratcliffe was threatening Russia with a nuclear strike? Or clandestine use of small nukes? If so, we won't know those details until the war is over.

Shop Work

We had a short regular work week this week. I have been working on more code related sanity checks in the Names Lexicon. Seems like every time I touch the files, I find more problems. No updates to the Paleo Bible this week.

Headline Review

The following caught my attention this week.

Star Base Louisiana

Full News Conference

The top link here is to a 13 minute video by Ellie in Space on Youtube. She reports on SpaceX's recent announcement of opening up a huge new space port on the gulf coast. In a previous blog, I linked a video about how this might happen. Now it is official.

The bottom link is the full 38 minute news conference where this project was formally announced. It includes the various speeches by the VIPs.

The top video is Ellie In Space's 18 minute report on the same event.

Immediate work is on remediation of trouble with eroding shorelines. 12 launch pads are planned for 125,000 acres. This is expected to become the largest space port in the world, with a planned capacity of 30 launches per day. The facility is expected to employ around 10,000 people. It is expected to cost $100B.

The second video includes Gwenn Shotwell's full speech for SpaceX. It also includes a couple minutes at the end dealing with what the state did to make this possible. Impressive.

This is the "Dot" location on the national USA Qu Map. Enoch, who was taken to heaven, is the angel who goes with this location. This is a major addition to the general Qu Map for the USA. Earlier examples at this same Qu Map location include fabrication of solid rocket boosters for NASA. This new project is just another step on a space related continuum for this location.

Ratcliffe to Moscow

Duran Commentary

Natural News Long Article

The top link is one of the early posts that marked Ratcliffe's trip to Moscow. The 2nd link is Duran commentary on Youtube with what was likely going on. The 3rd link is to a long form article on Natural News dealing with the same trip. The Duran video is the best. It provides reasonable commentary on what may have been going on. (I am, of course, more conspiratorial, since the villains always want to hide.)

Japanese Nuclear Weapons

The link here is to a post on Telegram citing a Russian official that suggests they expect Japan to have nuclear weapons within perhaps a year.

This is in the theme for the prophetic stories active through 2026-10-02. Work towards Japanese nukes would make sense given the history of Japan and the prophetic stories going on now.

Koreans Worried Too

The link here is to a brief post on Telegram by Tass suggesting the Koreans are also worried about Japanese remilitarization.

Operation Outcast

This link is to a Sonar21 long form article detailing the announcement on Monday, August 24, 2026, that the USA was going to sanction parties involved in trade with Iran. Because Iran is mostly self sufficient, external pressure has little leverage. Internal self sufficiency also means Iran's purchasing power parity is not that bad. This new set of sanctions is not expected to fundamentally alter life in Iran.

This particular headline is an alternative fulfillment for the date this week.

No Strikes, Mon, Tue, Wed

This link is to a post on X with the details of no strikes on Russia by Ukraine for Ratcliffe to travel to Moscow. This stretches the window for at trip onto our expected watch date of Wednesday.

Lake America

Trump signed an executive order changing the name of Lake Ontario in USGS government documents to be Lake America. This is a game called "Name it and Claim it" also known as "Blab it and grab it." These are power plays of gangsters. Presumably the next president, if there ever is one, will undo these things. Trump appears to be mentally ill. He is also suggesting the renaming of the oceans as well. Presumably the Pacific becomes the "West America Ocean" and the Atlantic becomes the "East America Ocean."

Washington: No MoU

This link is to a TASS post on Telegram. It notes that "Washington" is no longer interested in the MoU. Trump signed it, just like he will rename the Pacific, by stroke of the pen. So now he changes his mind? Trump appears to be a looser in more ways that 1. How can anyone trust anything he ever signs?

Not Only Ratcliffe

This link to a post on Telegram is a reminder that there was also a Vatican official in Moscow the same day as Ratcliffe. Unclear if connected. This post cites Lavrov. No publicly released clue from the Russian side about why these were in Moscow.

Starship Rescue

The link here is to a Youtube video from the "Whats going on with shipping" channel. It deals with getting SpaceX starship 40 out of the ocean and onto a larger ship for the trip back to Texas. There are times when SpaceX does stuff that is just inspiring.

More Later,

Phil